TheTameParrot.com – Let's Try To Solve Your Parrot Problems

I’m sure many of you have lost your pet, or certainly know someone who has. The sad fact is that most lost pets are never recovered.

About ten years ago, technology was developed that allowed you to implant a special microchip under the skin of your pet. This chip would enable any vet, rescue agency or shelter to identify the pet by “scanning” the chip with a hand held reader. By searching through a database, they can identify the pet owner and reunite the pet with its owners.

It sounds so simple! But unfortunately we humans have an incredible knack of messing up a good thing.

In order to explain it, I need to revisit the past…and look at another technological breakthrough…the home computer.

COMPUTER WARS

Back in the 80’s, computers were rapidly becoming a popular (but expensive) item for consumers. At that time, the main choice was IBM and Apple, with a hand full of other manufactures like Commodore and Atari. The other computers could not gain a foothold in the market because their operating systems were not compatible with the IBM’s or Apple, and this was important. IBM was mainly used in the business world, while Apple was entrenched into the classroom.

Apple accomplished a firm foothold by offering free computers to schools. The theory…teach students how to run Apples, and when they get older they will continue to use Apple computers. However, this didn’t quite work out, because the business world simply would not give up their dependency on IBM’s. So we ended up with students coming out of school who knew nothing about IBM’s, making all that computer training worthless. If you didn’t understand IBM systems, you didn’t have a job.

OK, still with me?

FREQUENCY WARS

While microchips have been around since the mid 1980’s, thet did not become popular for pet implants until 1995, when AVID Identification Systems began to offer them. Shortly afterward, other companies began to offer their own models, and AVID and HomeAgain (manufactured by Schering Plough) became the two main sources in the US. Both of these chips transmitted at the 125MHz frequency.

AVID then began to offer their hand scanners for free to shelters and veterinarians, but they would only read the AVID chip. If you bought the HomeAgain or some other competing model, your vet would be unable to scan it. Eventually they developed a “universal” scanner that could read any manufactured chip in the 125MHz range. Both of these models are widely available throughout the US and most of the world.

Now the fun begins. A new chip was designed by Banfield, who began distributing it around the world. They were entrenched into the PetSmart chain of stores, ensuring that they had a good distribution network and customer base. The problem? It transmitted at 134MHz, making it unreadable by the current scanners being used. Unless the shelter purchased a Banfield hand scanner, there was no other way to scan the chip.

This system is now widely used throughout the world…except the US. It gets even worse….the International Standards Organization, which attempts to set electric standards throughout the world, decreed that the 134MHz frequency should be the standard for pet microchips. And the battle begins!

It’s the Apple/IBM wars all over again. Or the BETA/VHS. This is why TV’s used in the US are not usable in Europe. When two manufactures develop competing standards, they wait for the consumer to decide, and the winner takes all! We have different manufacturers fighting over a standard, and the loser goes out of business. And the consumer always loses.

CURRENT STATUS

In October, 2005, Congress passed HR255.109, which was the appropriations bill for the Department of Agriculture. Tucked inside was a demand to APHIS (Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service) to develop a standard and implementation for microchips. I have not been able to find anything else regarding this bill…it seems to have fallen into a government crack.

The only solution to this problem is for someone to develop a universal scanner that can read both the 125MHz and the 134MHz chips. To complicate things even more, some manufactures use different frequencies, and even use encrypted chips. It’s unlikely anyone will combine all of these standards into one scanner.

CONCLUSION

The cost to microchip your pet is between $30-$80. The chip itself is not that expensive, but should be implanted by a vet or animal technician. In birds, it is usually implanted into the muscle, and usually into the breast. The chip itself is about the size of a grain of rice. It is a relatively painless procedure, much like getting a vaccination shot.

The other problem you will have is the lack of a central, universal data system. Each manufacturer keeps their own database. In some places, the government or local organization has established local databases.

In all cases, the chip is generally registered to the vet or shelter who sells the chip. In the event your pet is found, the rescue shelter will determine which chip was implanted and contact that manufacturer. The name of the vet is given, and from there the owner is tracked.

For a small fee, the owner can have their name entered into the database. But there has been a lot of instances where this information is lost or corrupted. It is suggested that owners contact the database holder on an annual basis and update their information.

The lack of a central data base will greatly complicate the recovery of your pet. But with competing manufacturers unwilling or unable to rectify their disputes over standards, I don’t see any quick solution to this. Trying to force standards appears to be bogged down, as evidenced by the APHIS bill that seems to be going nowhere.

Microchips are safe and inexpensive. Regardless of the lack of standards, it is recommended that you make the investment. The vast majority of lost pets are never returned, so this may be your only hope.

The other alternatives to microchips are unreliable. Tags and collars can fall off and become lost. Tattoos are permanent, but the shelter needs to know where to look and then figure out what database to search. At lease with microchips, you have some established databases, the microchip is secure and can’t be lost, and hopefully the shelter that scans it has the appropriate hand scanner to identify the chip.

[tags]lost birds, bird microchip, parrot microchips[/tags]